Working Through An Umbrella Company

The off-payroll working rules are unlikely to apply if you are employed by an umbrella company.


What happens if the rules apply?


The party responsible for applying the rules must determine whether the worker is employed for tax purposes. You can use the check employment status for tax (CEST) tool to help you make this determination.


A worker’s employment status for tax determines the taxes the worker and the deemed employer need to pay, depending on whether a worker is determined as employed or self-employed.


The off-payroll working rules apply on a contract-by-contract basis. A worker may have some contracts which are within the off-payroll working rules and some which are not. A contract for the purpose of the off-payroll working rules is a written, verbal, or implied agreement between parties.


If the rules apply, the client is responsible for determining the worker’s employment status for tax, and they should produce a status determination statement (SDS) including the reasons for their determination.


If the worker is deemed to be employed for tax purposes, the deemed employer must deduct Income Tax and employee National Insurance contributions from fees paid to the worker’s intermediary. Employer National Insurance contributions and Apprenticeship Levy, if applicable, must be paid to HMRC by the deemed employer.


20 September 2024
Understanding the Leadership Structure The leadership structure of a dental practice can significantly impact its financial performance. There are two primary models: Principal-led and Associate-led. Principal-led: In this model, the principal dentist owns and operates the practice, assuming full financial and management responsibility. Associate-led: Here, the dentist is a self-employed contractor to the practice, the principal dentist having the responsibility to provide patients and where necessary, to offer assistance and advice. Financial Implications Income Distribution: Principal-led: The principal dentist retains all profits after expenses, potentially leading to higher income but also greater financial risk. Associate-led : Associates receive a percentage of the fees that they generate as income, providing more financial stability but limiting earning potential. Overhead Costs: Principal-led: The principal dentist is responsible for all overhead costs, which can be substantial. Associate-led: The Associate is responsible for a share of the lab expenses that they generate Debt and Risk: Principal-led: The principal dentist is personally liable for any debts or financial obligations incurred by the practice. Associate-led: The associate is not responsible for the practice’s debts and liabilities. Succession Planning: Principal-led: Succession planning can be more complex, as the principal dentist must find a suitable successor or sell the practice. Associate-led: Succession planning can be easier, as associates may have an option to purchase the practice or continue working under new ownership. Financial Considerations When evaluating the financial implications of a Principal vs. Associate-led practice, consider the following factors: Personal financial goals: Are you seeking higher income potential or a more stable income stream? Risk tolerance: How comfortable are you with assuming personal financial risk? Long-term goals: What are your plans for the future of your dental career? Local market trends: Are there any trends that favour one model over the other in your opinion and experience? Conclusion The choice between a Principal-led or Associate-led dental practice sale and purchase depends on your individual circumstances and financial goals. By carefully considering the financial implications of each model, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your professional aspirations and long-term success. Feel free to contact us for more help and advice.
19 August 2024
Congratulations to Joanne Nurse on the acquisition of a share in Adventurers Day Nursery in York. Joanne now becomes co-owner of the nursery with Helen Nurse. Many thanks to everyone involved in the transaction, especially Amardeep Nangla for his work done on the property side and all those at Barclays Bank who helped facilitate this transaction. All at Jacobs Legal wish Helen and Joanne all the best for the future and much success in the years to come.
Share by: